CBUAE mandates stricter risk profiling for financial advisory products in the UAE, Strengthening consumer trust.
- CBUAE has issued fresh supervisory guidance raising suitability and risk profiling standards for all licensed financial institutions in the UAE.
- Updated expectations require robust digital audit trails to support advice records and enable effective dispute resolution.
- A three-stage disclosure model - pre-sale, point of contract, and ongoing - underpins the strengthened conduct framework.
- Federal Decree-Law No. 6 of 2025 expands CBUAE's supervisory perimeter across banks, insurers and other financial intermediaries.
- New CBUAE AI guidance introduces specific governance requirements for robo-advisory tools and algorithm-driven suitability assessments.
- Advisory firms must demonstrate consistent use of risk profiling processes backed by digital records reviewable by supervisors at any time.
UAE Consumer Protection Standards Drive Conduct-Risk Reform
The Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) has updated its supervisory expectations for licensed financial institutions, reinforcing obligations under the Consumer Protection Regulation (Circular No. 8 of 2020) and the accompanying Consumer Protection Standards. These requirements govern how retail financial advice is documented, disclosed and reviewed across the full product lifecycle. The updates reflect intensifying regulatory focus on conduct risk, client risk profiling quality, and the auditability of advice across the UAE financial services sector.
In parallel, the enactment of Federal Decree-Law No. 6 of 2025 - which consolidates banking and insurance oversight under the Central Bank - has meaningfully expanded CBUAE's supervisory reach. The Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA) has also issued robo-advisory regulations that introduce governance and disclosure requirements for algorithm-driven advice platforms. Together, these developments signal a more integrated and demanding compliance environment for advisory firms operating across the UAE.
What the Updated CBUAE Guidance Requires
CBUAE's refreshed expectations build on existing suitability and disclosure obligations rather than introducing a standalone new rule. Licensed firms must now implement more rigorous digital processes, including structured risk-profiling questionnaires and systems that capture the documented rationale for every recommendation. Critically, these records must be reproducible on demand, supporting both supervisory inspection and consumer dispute resolution.
The Consumer Protection Standards state that any specific advice given to a retail consumer must be fully documented, with a copy provided to the customer whenever a product is sold on the basis of that advice. Advice must not be untrue, misleading, or omit information that a customer needs to understand a product's costs, risks, terms and conditions. Regulators now expect firms to demonstrate that processes go beyond form-filling to deliver genuine, evidenced suitability assessments.
Three-Stage Disclosure: Pre-Sale, Contract and Ongoing
The Consumer Protection Standards establish a three-stage disclosure model that all advisory firms must apply: pre-sale, point of contract, and ongoing throughout the product term. Before a sale, institutions must provide plain-language explanations of features, pricing, benefits and risks, supported by a Key Facts Statement (KFS) - a standardised summary document that highlights key risks in clearly labelled "Warning" boxes.
At the contract stage, firms must allow customers time to review all terms, provide documentation free of charge, and supply a written summary of any suitability or affordability assessment at no cost to the client. Throughout the life of a product, firms must issue regular statements, timely notices of changes to pricing or terms, and transparent explanations of fees - all of which contribute to the auditable record that supervisors may inspect at any point.
Suitability as a Lifecycle Obligation, Not a One-Off Check
CBUAE's framework explicitly links suitability to responsible product governance, requiring firms to assess whether products are suitable and affordable before recommending solutions or granting credit. Where insurance or takaful is bundled with credit, firms must disclose the nature of the cover, its suitability for the individual client, associated fees and commissions, and clear termination conditions.
Market conduct specialists emphasise that suitability must be treated as a continuous obligation rather than a one-off onboarding exercise. Advisory firms must monitor whether products remain appropriate as client circumstances change, and ensure that third-party distributors and outsourced sales channels meet the same standards. The Consumer Protection Standards also connect suitability directly to complaints handling - the quality of an institution's advice records will form the evidentiary backbone if a consumer alleges mis-selling.
AI and Robo-Advisory: A New Governance Layer
CBUAE's February 2026 guidance on artificial intelligence (AI) in financial services introduces specific governance requirements for algorithm-driven suitability tools, including robo-advisory platforms and automated credit underwriting systems. Boards and senior management are held accountable for AI model outcomes, and firms must maintain detailed inventories covering each model's purpose, data inputs, assumptions, performance metrics and limitations.
Customers must be informed when AI drives key decisions - such as portfolio allocations or product recommendations - and must be able to request human review of those decisions. CBUAE explicitly warns against using AI to exploit behavioural biases or to target financially vulnerable customers with unsuitable products. These obligations sit alongside the SCA's 2025 robo-advisory regulations, creating a layered compliance framework for all automated advice platforms.
Practical Steps for Advisory Firms
Advisory businesses should expect supervisors to test not only whether risk profiling tools exist, but whether they are applied consistently and generate digital audit trails that can be reconstructed for any given client at any point in time. Firms must retain suitability and classification records for defined periods and align product eligibility and disclosures with accurate client classifications - whether retail, SME or institutional.
Internal audit and risk functions should review suitability processes on a regular basis, and governance bodies should receive structured reporting on conduct-risk indicators and consumer outcomes. The expanded supervisory perimeter under Federal Decree-Law No. 6 of 2025 means that advisory firms spanning wealth management, protection and retirement planning now face heightened scrutiny across all product segments. CBUAE's track record of sanctions in insurance and payments reinforces that documentation shortfalls carry real enforcement consequences.
What Clients are Asking their Advisors
What is a suitability assessment in UAE financial services?
A suitability assessment is a formal process where a licensed financial institution evaluates whether a product or service is appropriate for a specific customer, based on their financial profile, risk tolerance and objectives. Under CBUAE's Consumer Protection Standards, a written summary of this assessment must be provided to the customer at no charge before a sale is completed.
What documents must a UAE financial advisor provide before selling a product?
Before selling a financial product, advisors must provide a plain-language explanation of features, pricing, benefits, risks, fees and the customer's rights and obligations. This must be supported by a Key Facts Statement (KFS) - a standardised document highlighting key risks in clearly labelled warning boxes - along with a written summary of any suitability or affordability assessment.
How do CBUAE and SCA suitability rules compare for advisory firms in the UAE?
CBUAE's Consumer Protection Standards apply to banks, insurers and all CBUAE-licensed intermediaries, focusing on conduct, disclosure and risk profiling across the full product lifecycle. The SCA's 2025 robo-advisory regulations govern licensed portfolio management firms offering automated investment recommendations, adding requirements around IT audit, cybersecurity and algorithmic explainability. Firms operating across both licensing regimes must satisfy requirements from both regulators.
What are the consequences for UAE advisory firms that fail suitability documentation requirements?
CBUAE has signalled a clear willingness to use enforcement powers where conduct standards are breached, including licence suspension or revocation in serious cases. Inadequate suitability records also create direct commercial risk, as poor documentation is the weakest point in any mis-selling dispute and can lead to remediation orders following complaints escalated to CBUAE's Consumer Protection Department.
Further Reading
CBUAE Consumer Protection Standards (Official PDF)Grant Thornton: Consumer Protection and Market Conduct in UAE Financial Services
Chambers: UAE Investing in 2026 - Trends and Developments
UAE Central Bank Issues AI Guidelines for Financial Services
All content for information only. Not endorsement or recommendation.